U.S. Supreme Court ends ATS claims against Cisco in human rights case

What happened

The Supreme Court in Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I held that the Alien Tort Statute does not permit claims for aiding and abetting human rights abuses, dismissing the plaintiffs' case. The Court overruled the prior Sosa holding, stating that no new causes of action can be created under the ATS. The decision leaves the ability to hold technology companies accountable under the ATS unavailable without new congressional legislation.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

• Its status is decided. The case has an outcome that others may cite.
• The ruling closes a key legal avenue for holding tech firms liable for human rights violations, affecting privacy and surveillance accountability.

Who is affected

Recommended actions

1. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.
2. Inventory where this data is shared or sold and whether opt-outs are honoured.
3. Map the security requirements to existing controls and close gaps.
4. Inventory AI or automated decision systems in scope and their assessments.
5. Review age assurance and protections for minors' data.