REGULATORY WATCH BRIEF Moderate 41 📝 Proposed Bill announced

EFF urges states to require warrants for police searches of stored ALPR data

A warrant requirement would place an independent judicial check on location‑tracking surveillance, safeguarding personal privacy.

ImpactModerate 41
Type📝 Proposed Bill
Statusannounced not law
JurisdictionUS

What happened

The EFF calls on courts and state legislatures to require police to obtain a warrant before searching stored automated license‑plate‑reader (ALPR) data. The post cites numerous examples of warrantless searches used to profile ethnic groups, monitor protesters, investigate abortions, target immigrants, and stalk individuals. It argues that a warrant requirement would add judicial oversight and protect privacy.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

  • Its status is announced. It is not law yet. Track it, but do not treat it as an obligation.
  • A warrant requirement would place an independent judicial check on location‑tracking surveillance, safeguarding personal privacy.

Who is affected

government EFF ACLU of Northern California SIREN CAIR-California Institute for Justice

Recommended actions

  1. Review consent, cookie and tracking practices against the requirement.
  2. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.
  3. Map the security requirements to existing controls and close gaps.
  4. Inventory AI or automated decision systems in scope and their assessments.

Regulations library

Every US state privacy law, on one map

24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.

  • In force
  • Coming into force
  • Sector laws
AK ME VT NH WA ID MT ND MN IL WI MI NY RI MA OR NV WY SD IA IN OH PA NJ CT CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD DE AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC OK LA MS AL GA HI TX FL