Bernstein v. DOJ ruling holds encryption code is protected speech
The ruling secures encryption as protected speech, shaping privacy and security law for developers and users.
ADTP Regulatory Watch· October 13, 2026· CPPA
ImpactModerate 44
Type🔨 Court Ruling
Statusdecidedcase outcome
JurisdictionUS
What happened
The federal court ruled in Bernstein v. Department of Justice that code is speech protected by the First Amendment. The decision established a legal precedent that underpins modern internet privacy and security. The case arose after Dan Bernstein was forced to seek a license to publish his encryption algorithm.
Why it matters for trust and compliance
Its status is decided. The case has an outcome that others may cite.
The ruling secures encryption as protected speech, shaping privacy and security law for developers and users.
Who is affected
technologydeveloperElectronic Frontier FoundationDepartment of JusticeElectronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
Recommended actions
Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.
Map the security requirements to existing controls and close gaps.
Regulations library
Every US state privacy law, on one map
24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.