REGULATORY WATCH BRIEF Moderate 44 🔨 Court Ruling decided

Bernstein v. DOJ ruling holds encryption code is protected speech

The ruling secures encryption as protected speech, shaping privacy and security law for developers and users.

ImpactModerate 44
Type🔨 Court Ruling
Statusdecided case outcome
JurisdictionUS

What happened

The federal court ruled in Bernstein v. Department of Justice that code is speech protected by the First Amendment. The decision established a legal precedent that underpins modern internet privacy and security. The case arose after Dan Bernstein was forced to seek a license to publish his encryption algorithm.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

  • Its status is decided. The case has an outcome that others may cite.
  • The ruling secures encryption as protected speech, shaping privacy and security law for developers and users.

Who is affected

technology developer Electronic Frontier Foundation Department of Justice Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)

Recommended actions

  1. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.
  2. Map the security requirements to existing controls and close gaps.

Regulations library

Every US state privacy law, on one map

24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.

  • In force
  • Coming into force
  • Sector laws
AK ME VT NH WA ID MT ND MN IL WI MI NY RI MA OR NV WY SD IA IN OH PA NJ CT CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD DE AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC OK LA MS AL GA HI TX FL