REGULATORY WATCH BRIEF Low 37 🔨 Court Ruling decided

Austrian Federal Administrative Court orders ORF to redesign cookie banner for equal consent options

The ruling clarifies that cookie consent mechanisms must offer equally prominent opt‑in and opt‑out options, impacting many online services.

ImpactLow 37
Type🔨 Court Ruling
Statusdecided case outcome
JurisdictionEU-AT
CaseC037-401

What happened

The Federal Administrative Court (BVwG) upheld the Austrian Data Protection Authority's 2024 decision that ORF.at's cookie banner violates the GDPR. The court ruled that the ‘Accept’ button must not be highlighted in colour and that ‘Accept’ and ‘Reject’ buttons must have equal prominence. ORF must redesign its banner to obtain valid, unambiguous consent.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

  • Its status is decided. The case has an outcome that others may cite.
  • The ruling clarifies that cookie consent mechanisms must offer equally prominent opt‑in and opt‑out options, impacting many online services.
  • It relates to GDPR. The regulations library explains what that law requires.

Who is affected

media controller Austrian Broadcasting Corporation (ORF) ORF.at ORF (Austrian Broadcasting Corporation)

Recommended actions

  1. Review consent, cookie and tracking practices against the requirement.
  2. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.

Regulations library

Every US state privacy law, on one map

24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.

  • In force
  • Coming into force
  • Sector laws
AK ME VT NH WA ID MT ND MN IL WI MI NY RI MA OR NV WY SD IA IN OH PA NJ CT CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD DE AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC OK LA MS AL GA HI TX FL