REGULATORY WATCH BRIEF Moderate 44 🔨 Court Ruling pending

Supreme Court to decide VPPA consumer definition in Salazar v. Paramount Global

The ruling will determine how broadly the VPPA applies to digital video platforms and tracking technologies.

ImpactModerate 44
Type🔨 Court Ruling
Statuspending case open
JurisdictionUS

What happened

The Supreme Court will hear Salazar v. Paramount Global in the October 2026 term to resolve a circuit split on the definition of “consumer” under the Video Privacy Protection Act. The case arises from a class action alleging Paramount disclosed a user’s video‑viewing history via a Meta tracking pixel without consent. Lower courts dismissed the claim, with the Sixth Circuit affirming dismissal in April 2025.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

  • Its status is pending. The case is still open; the outcome may change what it means.
  • The ruling will determine how broadly the VPPA applies to digital video platforms and tracking technologies.
  • It relates to VPPA. The regulations library explains what that law requires.

Who is affected

technology media controller processor Paramount Global Meta EPIC

Recommended actions

  1. Review consent, cookie and tracking practices against the requirement.
  2. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.
  3. Inventory where this data is shared or sold and whether opt-outs are honoured.
  4. Inventory AI or automated decision systems in scope and their assessments.

Regulations library

Every US state privacy law, on one map

24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.

  • In force
  • Coming into force
  • Sector laws
AK ME VT NH WA ID MT ND MN IL WI MI NY RI MA OR NV WY SD IA IN OH PA NJ CT CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD DE AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC OK LA MS AL GA HI TX FL