REGULATORY WATCH BRIEF Low 35 📂 Lawsuit Filed pending

Paramount asks SCOTUS to reject video privacy lawsuit

The case could shape how video service providers handle user viewing data and tracking technologies under U.S. privacy law.

ImpactLow 35
Type📂 Lawsuit Filed
Statuspending case open
JurisdictionUS

What happened

Paramount has filed a brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to reject a video privacy claim. The Electronic Privacy Information Center and other privacy advocates filed a friend‑of‑the‑court brief supporting Salazar, arguing the video privacy law allows lawsuits by any individual with a commercial relationship to a video service provider. They also contend that Paramount could use contextual advertising without employing the Meta Pixel.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

  • Its status is pending. The case is still open; the outcome may change what it means.
  • The case could shape how video service providers handle user viewing data and tracking technologies under U.S. privacy law.

Who is affected

technology media controller platform Paramount Electronic Privacy Information Center

Recommended actions

  1. Review consent, cookie and tracking practices against the requirement.
  2. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.
  3. Inventory where this data is shared or sold and whether opt-outs are honoured.

Regulations library

Every US state privacy law, on one map

24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.

  • In force
  • Coming into force
  • Sector laws
AK ME VT NH WA ID MT ND MN IL WI MI NY RI MA OR NV WY SD IA IN OH PA NJ CT CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD DE AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC OK LA MS AL GA HI TX FL