REGULATORY WATCH BRIEF Low 30 🔨 Court Ruling decided

Supreme Court ruling allows Arizona mail ballots to proceed as usual

The decision impacts voting procedures and raises privacy concerns over potential bulk data collection by DHS.

ImpactLow 30
Type🔨 Court Ruling
Statusdecided case outcome
JurisdictionUS-AZ

What happened

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision permitting the continued use of mail ballots in Arizona, which are used by 75% of voters. The ruling was challenged by the League of Women Voters and EPIC, who argued it would give DHS broad authority to collect and disclose Americans' sensitive information.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

  • Its status is decided. The case has an outcome that others may cite.
  • The decision impacts voting procedures and raises privacy concerns over potential bulk data collection by DHS.

Who is affected

government League of Women Voters Electronic Privacy Information Center

Recommended actions

  1. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.

Regulations library

Every US state privacy law, on one map

24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.

  • In force
  • Coming into force
  • Sector laws
AK ME VT NH WA ID MT ND MN IL WI MI NY RI MA OR NV WY SD IA IN OH PA NJ CT CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD DE AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC OK LA MS AL GA HI TX FL