REGULATORY WATCH BRIEF Low 32 🔨 Court Ruling dismissed

California trial court dismisses SIREN v. San Jose challenge to warrantless ALPR searches

The dismissal highlights ongoing legal battles over mass surveillance via ALPRs and their privacy implications.

ImpactLow 32
Type🔨 Court Ruling
Statusdismissed case outcome
JurisdictionUS-CA

What happened

A California trial court dismissed SIREN v. San Jose, a case brought by EFF and the ACLU challenging the city’s warrantless searches of automated license plate reader data. The court held that drivers have no reasonable expectation of privacy on public roads, rejecting the privacy claim. EFF plans to appeal the decision.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

  • Its status is dismissed. The case has an outcome that others may cite.
  • The dismissal highlights ongoing legal battles over mass surveillance via ALPRs and their privacy implications.

Who is affected

government technology San Jose EFF ACLU of Northern California CAIR California Flock

Recommended actions

  1. Review consent, cookie and tracking practices against the requirement.
  2. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.

Regulations library

Every US state privacy law, on one map

24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.

  • In force
  • Coming into force
  • Sector laws
AK ME VT NH WA ID MT ND MN IL WI MI NY RI MA OR NV WY SD IA IN OH PA NJ CT CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD DE AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC OK LA MS AL GA HI TX FL