California trial court dismisses SIREN v. San Jose challenge to warrantless ALPR searches
The dismissal highlights ongoing legal battles over mass surveillance via ALPRs and their privacy implications.
ADTP Regulatory Watch· October 13, 2026
ImpactLow 32
Type🔨 Court Ruling
Statusdismissedcase outcome
JurisdictionUS-CA
What happened
A California trial court dismissed SIREN v. San Jose, a case brought by EFF and the ACLU challenging the city’s warrantless searches of automated license plate reader data. The court held that drivers have no reasonable expectation of privacy on public roads, rejecting the privacy claim. EFF plans to appeal the decision.
Why it matters for trust and compliance
Its status is dismissed. The case has an outcome that others may cite.
The dismissal highlights ongoing legal battles over mass surveillance via ALPRs and their privacy implications.
Who is affected
governmenttechnologySan JoseEFFACLU of Northern CaliforniaCAIR CaliforniaFlock
Recommended actions
Review consent, cookie and tracking practices against the requirement.
Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.
Regulations library
Every US state privacy law, on one map
24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.