REGULATORY WATCH BRIEF Low 35 📂 Lawsuit Filed filed

Paramount urges SCOTUS to reject video privacy claim

The Supreme Court case could shape how video service providers handle consumer viewing data and contextual advertising.

ImpactLow 35
Type📂 Lawsuit Filed
Statusfiled case open
JurisdictionUS

What happened

Paramount filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to reject a video privacy claim under the video privacy law. The Electronic Privacy Information Center and other privacy advocates filed an amicus brief supporting the plaintiff, arguing the law protects consumers' viewing choices. The case centers on whether contextual advertising can be used without sharing viewing data via tools like the Meta Pixel.

Why it matters for trust and compliance

  • Its status is filed. The case is still open; the outcome may change what it means.
  • The Supreme Court case could shape how video service providers handle consumer viewing data and contextual advertising.

Who is affected

technology media controller platform Paramount Pictures Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)

Recommended actions

  1. Check that privacy notices describe the practices this addresses.
  2. Inventory where this data is shared or sold and whether opt-outs are honoured.
  3. Inventory AI or automated decision systems in scope and their assessments.

Regulations library

Every US state privacy law, on one map

24 states have a comprehensive privacy law in the library, alongside the EU, UK, US federal and global laws: 102 in all, each explained in plain words with its sources. Select a state to see what applies there.

  • In force
  • Coming into force
  • Sector laws
AK ME VT NH WA ID MT ND MN IL WI MI NY RI MA OR NV WY SD IA IN OH PA NJ CT CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD DE AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC OK LA MS AL GA HI TX FL